ABNORMAL ANIMAL BEHAVIOR AND THE PREDICTION OF EARTHQUAKES
: Not seriously considered in the Western scientific world until the 1960'; relies
almost exclusively on instrumental measurements.
: Observable geophysical and geochemical changes which precede an earthquake.
Folklore of abnormal animal behavior
: Date back several thousand years, from many parts of the world; observations made
primarily by laymen and non-scientists - thus, reliability and accuracy is suspect.
Pivotal historical event
: World's first prediction of a major earthquake took place in China in 1975 using
abnormal animal behavior as well as geophysical data; a town of 90,000 inhabitants
(Haicheng) was evacuated before a magnitude 7.3 earthquake struck; very few lives
were lost. This prediction aroused interest in studying abnormal animal behavior in the
: If abnormal animal behavior before earthquakes can be understood
and is a reliable
prediction method, it may be called a biological precursor.
Analysis of the data
: Should consider the following questions...
1. How reliable is the data?
2. Can non-seismic noise factors be eliminated from the data set?
3. What is the "normal" behavior of the animals when no earthquake is imminent?
4. Can a particular geophysical/geochemical change be shown to cause the observed
behavior in animals?
5. How many individual animals within a population tend to be more sensitive to
6. What are the sensory thresholds (limits of detection by the senses) of the animals
to different stimuli?
Summary of folklore accounts
Earliest accounts date back 3000 years, imperial Chinese records contain 50 million
words; difficult to interpret.
Observations made by farmers and peasants - usually farm animals and housepets are
Chinese scientists have identified 58 species of wild and domestic animals as having
reliable anomalous reactions before earthquakes.
Most dramatic reports
1. Hibernating snakes leaving their burrows during the winter, one month before
the 1975 Haicheng (M = 7.3) earthquake; froze to death.
2. Fish leaping from the water into the air, sometimes onto land. (China)
3. Deep sea fish swimming near the surface waters (caught by Japanese fishermen).
SYSTEMATIC STUDY OF THE PHENOMENA
: Only feasible for recent earthquakes.
1. Retrospective studies
: Interviews of people who experienced an earthquake and observed unusual animal
behavior before the event; attempt to identify statistical patterns in the behavior.
2. Laboratory simulations
: Controlled experiments to investigate the sensory thresholds of animals; attempt
to isolate the particular geophysical/geochemical changes which might cause their
Summary of Chinese Data by Academia Sinica
1. Most animals in the seismic area become increasingly restless, and a number
of them fall into a state of anxiety.
2. These features may appear from a few minutes to as long as ten days before
the earthquake, but usually the precursor time is within 24 hours of the quake.
3. These phenomena appear to have a non-random and non-uniform regional distribution,
occurring mostly in particular belts of the seismic area and in certain regions.
These places correlate to some degree with the strike of active faults, as well
as with the bends, branches or terminal points of faults. It appears that they tend
to be in the epicentral area or high-intensity zones of the impending earthquake.
4. These remarkable changes in animal behavior generally precede a destructive
earthquake of magnitude 5 or greater.
5. Although there is great variety in the cases of unusual behavior, generally
speaking, this behavior falls in to the category of increased restlessness - being
startled, extremely nervous, and panicky, as if the animals were on the brink of
meeting their natural enemies. A small number of animals may become depressed or apathetic.
6. Macroscopic (detectable without instrumentation) changes in animal behavior
constitute only one of many precursors of earthquakes. So far as the time of occurrence
is concerned, it can be used as a means of extremely short-term forecasting. Combined with data from other disciplines, animal observations may be of some value in
making an overall judgment.
7. Anomalous animal behavior has also been noticed during the earthquake, as
well as before.
8. The number of animals of any given species that behave abnormally prior
to earthquakes is not necessarily a high proportion of the total population (usually,
only a fraction of a given species shows unusual behavior). Some show no anomalous
behavior; on the other hand, some anomalous animal behavior may not be followed by an
earthquake. Furthermore, it must be noted that much of the data were collected after
the earthquakes had occurred.
9. The unusual behavior is not necessarily related only to earthquakes. Non-seismological
factors can sometimes cause similar behavior. Although such interfering factors
have been investigated, it is almost impossible to eliminate them completely.
Types of Geophysical Phenomena Tested on Animals
1. Sound with an intensity and frequency outside the range of human perception
2. variations in local magnetic or electric fields
3. ground vibrations or foreshocks
4. changes in groundwater level
5. electromagnetic waves
6. release of gases usually trapped beneath earth's surface
Precursors unlikely to be detected by animals
velocity variations in P-waves/S-waves
electrical resistivity changes
SOUND & VIBRATIONS
Range of human hearing
: 20 - 20,000 Hz
Sensitivity not uniform
: Humans hear best in the mid-range (100 Hz to 10,000 Hz); vibrations below 20 Hz
are felt rather than heard.
: Birds (pigeons, owls) much more sensitive than humans; fish, even more so, since
water transmits these sounds more efficiently than air. Low-frequency sound is highly
energetic (which produces long wavelengths), travels great distances without appreciable attenuation in a radiating (non-directional) pattern. Foreshocks and seismic
waves typically in the 0.1 - 10 Hz range.
Mid-range frequency sound
: Most mammals not much more sensitive than humans. Rock fracturing emits sounds
up to 3000 Hz.
: Mice and rats hear and "speak" upwards to 80,000 Hz. High-frequency sound is low-energy,
highly directional, easily attenuated by obstacles. Rocks under extreme stress produce
ultrasound (100,000 - 1,000,000 Hz) when fine hairline cracks appear, just before fracturing.
: Low-frequency sound below 50 Hz (infrasound) is best candidate for explaining anomalous
behavior far from the epicenter, and behavior of fish.
1. ELECTRIC FIELD CHANGES
: Most sensitive animals are aquatic
, especially "electric" fish (stingrays, electric catfish), sharks, catfish, eels.
Land animals are about 4 orders of magnitude less sensitive to electric field changes.
: Variations also occur due to rainfall, electrical and magnetic storms. Land animals
2. MAGNETIC FIELD CHANGES
: Birds (pigeons, gulls) and honeybees are most sensitive animals.
: Variations due to normal (non-seismic) factors are only 30 gammas; those due to
earthquakes are usually only 20 gammas. Such changes are barely within the detection
ranges of even the most sensitive animals.
3. ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION
: Overexposure to microwaves can cause sickness in humans; can throw migrating birds
off course (due to powerful radar antenna).
: Poorly documented phenomena, no mechanisms yet proposed.
4. AIR IONS
: Charged airborne particles (aeorsols), especially small, positively-charged
ions, can produce significant physiological deterioration (studied in laboratory
animals and humans - increase in body levels of serotonin
: burrowing animals fleeing from underground burrows, animals fleeing any enclosed
structures (where electrostatic charge density is high), birds flying continuously
and refusing to land.
: Not enough data collected to make quantitative interpretation; increased air ion
levels before earthquakes, and mechanisms not definitely established.
PHENOMENA RELATED TO OPENING OR CLOSING OF SMALL CRACKS IN ROCKS
5. GROUNDWATER LEVEL CHANGES
: irregular water levels, artesian flow, muddy wells, and oily wells have been observed
before many historic earthquakes.
May account for
: behavior of underground or burrowing animals (change of water table floods their
: Non-seismic factors due to seasonal changes and rainfall occur very often.
6. RELEASE OF UNDERGROUND GASES
: radon, sulfides, ozone, methane, etc. have been cited. Nearly all animals have
a better sense of smell than humans.
: Gas most often measured for precursory changes in levels. However, radon is inert,
and animals probably cannot detect it.
: May explain the anecdotal accounts of animals seeming to react to strange smells
: Most data available account only for radon; measurements of other gases released
1. Acoustic waves and vibrations in the frequency range 10 - 50 Hz
: More measurements of animal behavior to sound both in air and under water are needed.
2. Electric field changes and air ion monitoring
: More measurements of electric fields are needed to compare terrestrial and aquatic
environments. Monitoring equipment for changes in air ion levels should also be
3. Earthquake gases other than radon
: Radon is the most often measured gas before earthquakes; however, radon is chemically
inert, and animals probably are insensitive to it. Methane, ozone, and sulfur compounds
are likely candidates for further monitoring of gases released prior to earthquakes.
4. Olfactory thresholds for odors
: Most of the data on animal sensitivities to natural odorants are not quantitative.
Quantitative data are necessary to test the effects of gaseous geochemical precursors
5. Responses of common domestic animals
: Dogs, cows, horses, and chickens are the animals most commonly mentioned in the
anecdotes. Surprisingly, there have been few or no controlled studies of the sensitivities
of these animals to low-frequency sound, vibrations, electric fields (with the exception of dogs), and odorous gases (Buskirk et al., 1981).
CONSENSUS OF MOST WESTERN RESEARCHERS
"There is, as yet, no conclusive scientific evidence for believing that abnormal animal
behavior is in any way related to the occurence of earthquakes. There is, however,
general agreement among scientists that a great many of the anecdotal accounts are
entirely plausible in light of what is known about animal sensory capabilities and
the level of many seismic precursors."
Existing Western techniques have the following limitations
1. Earthquakes cannot be predicted where there are no instruments.
2. Instrumental surveillance of all possible seismic areas is too expensive.
3. Instruments cannot tell or estimate when an earthquake will occur.
Conclusions of world reknowned geophysicist, T. Rikitake (1982)
"While not all of the legends may be true, it is important for scientists to look
into things which might contain some truth, without being biased. From a statistical
analysis of all available data, such behavior may sometimes be used as an extremely
short-term seismic precursor."